The lab tour was one of the activities I looked forward to during Physics Month. Rarely does NIP open its Research Wing for us freshmen. I was hyped to see what the upperclass do in the laboratories. It was a peek to what I could be doing 2-3 years from now.
We visited the six laboratories of NIP. Each were only given a limited amount of time. However, we were still able to get the overviews of the laboratories. I learned new cool things during the tour, but what I liked most about it was that it made my interest in Physics grow. It showed me how broad Physics is, how it is essential in different fields and the opportunities ahead after taking the course.
After the lab tour, I also attended the Career Talk. The speakers were really great. Although they were talking about work, they still managed to be very entertaining and interesting. I loved how relaxed and confident they were, and how they assured us that great opportunities are ahead of us.
Overall, it was a great day. It was a nice break from sitting down for three hours. The tour was really educational. I also how my colleagues enjoyed the day as well. :)
Sunday, March 15, 2015
Saturday, March 14, 2015
Orientation
The first day of laboratory class was January 26, 2015. It was the first time in a long time that I had a Monday class. Like a normal student, I was not exactly delighted about getting out of bed early for an 8 a.m. class that lasts for a maximum of three hours. Moreover, I only had the littlest clues on what experiments can be done in class and none of them appealed to me as fun.
But that Monday, when I got there, I found myself realizing that I can enjoy this course. A contributing factor was that I already knew most of the people in class. Some of my classmates were my friends from the first semester, many were my acquaintances, and my professor was my Physics 10 instructor last semester. Another was the variety of experiments we would be doing. I get to handle tools and devices I had never encountered before. Lastly are the skills I would acquire and hone in the course.
Sunday, February 15, 2015
Activity 3: Philippine Coins and their Densities
Activity 3 was still about measurement. Here, we were asked to measure the 5 centavo coin, 10 centavo coin, 25 peso coin, 1 peso coin and 5 peso coin, and find their densities. We measured the diameter and thickness of the coin using a vernier caliper, and each coin's mass using a weighing scale.
Measurement of the coins:
With these measurements, we are able calculate the volumes (v) of the coins. Since v = pi*r^2*t and r = d/2, v = (pi*d^2*t)/4. As for the 5 centavo coin which has hole, its volume can be found by calculating the volume of the coin disregarding the hole, and subtract it by the volume of the hole of the coin.
The next step is to find the density. Density is equal to mass over volume.
Hence:
Measurement of the coins:
The next step is to find the density. Density is equal to mass over volume.
Hence:
Acitvity 1 & 2: Length of a Rice Grain
The laboratory activity for this day (February 2, 2015) focused on the proper handling of the vernier caliper, the first part of Activity 1. The class used the vernier caliper to measure grains of rice. We were asked to measure at least 50 rice grains. We also recorded the results from the measurements done, compared our own group’s data with others and checked whether the results correspond to the grain’s approximate measure, (7.09mm ± 0.36mm). It was a helpful activity since it was my first time to use a caliper. It also taught me that systematic errors are bound to happen when dealing with measurements, but one can get an accurate and precise measurement.
-
Activity 2 was also measuring grains of rice, but this time, using a micrometer caliper. The micrometer caliper was a more sensitive device compared to the vernier caliper because a parallax would result to error. But when handled properly, it would give a more accurate measure because its degree of error is only ± 0.01mm, while the vernier caliper's degree of error is ± 0.02mm.
-
Activity 2 was also measuring grains of rice, but this time, using a micrometer caliper. The micrometer caliper was a more sensitive device compared to the vernier caliper because a parallax would result to error. But when handled properly, it would give a more accurate measure because its degree of error is only ± 0.01mm, while the vernier caliper's degree of error is ± 0.02mm.
Combing the data of Activity 1 and 2, my group and I measured 50 rice grains for the vernier caliper, and 100 rice grains for the micrometer. The results from the accumulated data are as follows:
(Credits: Mike Go)
(Credits: Mike Go)
With the help of our classmate, Chris Sevilla, we were able to make a Gaussian Distribution of the data.
From the image above, we could see that the peak of the Gaussian Fit is 7.0956 mm to 7.1648 mm. The peak also represents the acceptable range of the length of the rice grains. Comparing this value to 7.09mm ± 0.36mm, we can conclude that our output is accurate.
Sources:
Sources:
1. R.C. Batac, Different Levels of Approximation in Measruement, http://rcbteaching.blogspot.com/2015/02/physics-1011-different-levels-of.html, February 15, 2015
2. Sevilla, Christopher, What is the length of 1 Rice Grain, http://thephysics101p1files.blogspot.com/, February 15, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)